|
Poet: Robert Lowell
Poem: For the Union Dead
Volume: Life Studies and For the Union Dead
Year: Published/Written in 1964
Comment 8 of 8, added on January 13th, 2009 at 12:31 AM.
Lowell wasn't trying to write a sentimental glorification of war, but to comment on how a consumerist America thought parking lots more important. What's "mediocre" isn't the poem, it's the people who in savage servility slide by on grease.
Edward G. Nilges from United States
Comment 7 of 8, added on August 17th, 2008 at 6:55 PM.
Peter's comments helped me see what I was struggling with as I studied this poem. I particularly thrilled to his insight into the function of form: "What is missing is clarity and form; clarity of meaning, and the economy and intensity of expression that form gives. " --- Linda's comments are just beautifully written, with a charming liveliness and presence, that adorn her fine (expansion of Peter's?) essay. I was pleased, too, with her firm distinction between the events addressed by the poem and the poem itself. --- I do agree with both writers and was disappointed by the poem itself; it strikes me as quite sophomoric, actually. --- Thank you all very much for entering my life thus and, thus, enhancing it.
Susan Jeswine O'Shea from United States
Comment 6 of 8, added on March 29th, 2008 at 11:35 AM.
Funny how many of these comments were written in spring. In the harshness of a New England spring, the place where I sit writing this, the weather is both glorious and raw. It is much like Lowell's poem, the movie "Glory" and the romance attached to the Mass 54.
The romance is earned but then, I am a romantic. Dr. King once wrote that he would be just as dead at 80 as 30 so whynot die for something you believe in. He, too, a romantic.
And a pragmatist of the highest order.
As it happens, I am married to a Shaw descendent, named after the good colonel, actually. And I worked beside a descendant of the Mass. 54th flag-bearer. William Carney. No one mentions him here or in the poem although Carney was the first African American to win a Congressional Medal of Honor for his bravery at Wagner.
But you can google Carney on your own.
About Lowell's poem, well, I agree with Belarus. It is mediocre. But the subject is glorious. I will not get the two confused. The poem rambles. Yes, ambiguity is a poet's lance, however, the ambiguous is made clear in a good poem: an idea, a feeling is caught and held together.
Lowell is miserable and bitter. At least, that's the poet's voice in a poem that links urban life in the 1960s to a historic event far greater than bull-dozers digging up Boston Common.
What is Lowell saying? That he finds complaint in everything. What does he seem to say about the 54th? That the only name worth mentioning is Shaw's (Frederick Douglass had 2 sons in this company). That his father preferred the ditch. So did his mother. They both felt the son would have chosen that "honor" of being buried with his men in that fashion at that time.
History is buried there: the cultural slights of a time of racism and gentlemanly behavior meeting on a battleground. A different history is in that grave than just who won and lost.
Lowell's poem is a good idea but it is not a good poem.
(Note: MLK's speech before the march on Selma, may have the referenced ages wrong but the point is the same.)
linda from United States
Are you looking for more information on this poem? Perhaps you are trying to analyze it? The poem, For the Union Dead, has received 8 comments. Click here to read them, and perhaps post a comment of your own. Of course you can also always discuss poems by Robert Lowell with others on the American Poems poetry forum!
|
Lowell wasn't trying to write a sentimental glorification of war, but to comment on how a consumerist America thought parking lots more important. What's "mediocre" isn't the poem, it's the people who in savage servility slide by on grease.
Edward G. Nilges from United States