1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14  16 17 18 19
Comment 42 of 182, added on February 26th, 2006 at 10:45 AM.
This poem is like looking at a slide in a laboratory with the naked eye and
then putting it under a microscope. To those who can't see anything in this
poem, keep on looking, you will. Or try going on the
metro/tube-train/underground-railway and just stand there and watch.
Memorize the three lines, say them to yourself as you observe the faces you
may never see again. Think of Spring, all the millions of petals of blossom
actually on the boughs. Think of people's lives, transient and fragile as
petals. Birth, blooming, dying, getting on and off at different stations in
their lives, in your life, ghosts, memories, all aboard the train of life,
all clinging precariously for a brief moment on the tree of life. Are you
getting there? Buy the ticket, take a ride, you've nothing to lose but your
F. Philip Holland from United Kingdom
Comment 41 of 182, added on February 24th, 2006 at 11:24 PM.
Poems don't matter on quantity but on quality.
Ezra Pound wrote a poem comparing two different, concrete things. This poem
can have a million different
interpretations but this is what I believe is the literal level.
First, I read the Title, In A Station of the Metro; how to describe the
Metro? Dark, dingy, isolated, underground.
Then something comes by..a dark, speeding, dingy train and he sees
something not so dark, crowds of peoples faces, bursts of color everywhere.
This reminds him of bright petals on ebony limbs, and he emphasizes the
darkness by saying the bough was wet.
So Ezra is comparing two things but the fun part is when you try to think
of what his "hidden" meanings are.
Katie from United States
Comment 40 of 182, added on February 12th, 2006 at 6:42 AM.
The author of "In a station of the Metro" is not Langston Hughes, as I
said. It was Ezra Pound of course
from United States
Comment 39 of 182, added on February 12th, 2006 at 6:31 AM.
When I 1st read this poem I didn't liked it at all because it seemed too
confusig and short of a good ending. In fact, it doesn't even has a good
start. But then again, when I read it like 4 times more, I realized the
power this poem has. It can send you to see what the author was thinking,
imagine a full scene of what's happening. Later I ended liking the way
Hughes wrote his poems. You just have to read it more than once to get that
Misael from United States
Comment 38 of 182, added on January 23rd, 2006 at 5:44 PM.
This poem may be short, but it really only needs two lines because it's
deep. For the readers who claim it's to short and confusing... your
ingnorant and need to take the time to read into it instead of just
whinning and complaining because your to lazy to try and figure it out.
Comment 37 of 182, added on January 19th, 2006 at 4:31 PM.
This poem like many of Pounds work is interesting. He was the father of
imagism and the poem speaks directly toward that. The original poem was
much longer but he couldn't quite come up with the words he wanted to use
so its not like he came up with this instaneously. If it requires thought
to write then it requires thought to read. He wants us to read exactly
between the lines.
Maureen from United States
Comment 36 of 182, added on January 5th, 2006 at 12:38 PM.
I have to do a project on this!!!!
lauren from Canada
Comment 35 of 182, added on December 12th, 2005 at 1:02 PM.
i did not really like his poetry.....
Jessica from United States
Comment 34 of 182, added on December 12th, 2005 at 8:11 AM.
I am not going to launch into an analysis of the poem, or why and how I
like it. I just think it's a little sad that some people feel like saying
things like "two weak ass lines can't really be a good poem", then have the
arrogance to accuse likers of the poem of being 'losers'. I thought the
idea of this exchange of comments was to agree and disagree -yes, give
different opinions, perspectives and ideas, but not actually insult people
who have different opinions. To insult people who do not have the same
opinion of a poem as you do is to have a fairly immature idea of poetry.
oliver from China
Comment 33 of 182, added on November 8th, 2005 at 7:33 PM.
This kind of poem may well be based on haiku, but readers need to know that
there is a valuable form called a "matchbox poem" or "Ezra" (yes,
specifically named for what Ezra Pound developed and most often quoted as
this example). The key to the form is two lines; the first is from
experience of the world, the second is a reaction from the imagination.
Realistically, the interpretation is that Pound has walked down into the
station of the subway (called the Metro in Paris) and been struck by the
contrast of the pink faces against the backdrop of the dominantly dark
plain clothes that the commuters would have been wearing (I am not certain,
but I think that it dates to 1926.Although there are many African-French
people there now, there would then have been few non-white faces around
then.) The word "apparition" is perfect, conveying the sense of a sudden,
almost ghostly appearance. The second line is how poets "work". To be a
poet means to see the same things as others do, but see them differently,
or to have a desire to capture the difference in words. Perhaps it was
Spring. It doesn't matter, but what Pound sees is an image that reminds him
of petals against - well, he even thinks of the boughs being wet because
that will make them look darker. It is quite easy to get even young
children to write similar styles of poem. Just focus in one line on
observing with one particular sense, and then respond in a second line to
how it might be interpreted in the imagination. Of course, the whole thing
can be scaled up into larger pieces, but they might not fit in a matchbox.
Geoff from Australia
This poem has been commented on more than 10 times. Click below to see the other comments.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14  16 17 18 19