|
Poet: Emily Dickinson
Poem: 561.
I measure every Grief I meet
Volume: Complete Poems of Emily Dickinson
Year: Published/Written in 1955
Comment 7 of 7, added on January 15th, 2007 at 2:23 PM.
I must modify my previous comment: "Poems," published in 1896, did entitle the poem "Griefs," and it did omit the fourth stanza. All ten stanzas, including the fourth stanza, were printed in "The New England Quarterly," XX, (1947). These citations are from Johnson's notes. Perhaps there is a basis for some genuine controversy, I accept Johnson's versions, in the absence of any subsequent evidence to the contrary.
roger schmeeckle from United States
Comment 6 of 7, added on January 15th, 2007 at 2:10 PM.
Leigh, I do not know what is the basis for your criticism of the poem as reproduced.
The fourth stanzs is included in the Thomas Johnson edition of the complete poems.
Many editions of Emily Dickinson's poems were published before a reliable, scholarly edition was published.
"Griefs" is not the title of the poem. Emily Dickinson did not give titles to her poems. They are usually identified by their first lines, "I measure every Grief I meet" in this case.
roger schmeeckle from United States
Comment 5 of 7, added on February 3rd, 2006 at 4:37 PM.
Someone please help me find a credible source for this poem? I looked every where and could not find one. Please write back at my e-mail
James from Armenia
Are you looking for more information on this poem? Perhaps you are trying to analyze it? The poem, I measure every Grief I meet, has received 7 comments. Click here to read them, and perhaps post a comment of your own. Of course you can also always discuss poems by Emily Dickinson with others on the American Poems poetry forum!
|
I must modify my previous comment: "Poems," published in 1896, did entitle the poem "Griefs," and it did omit the fourth stanza. All ten stanzas, including the fourth stanza, were printed in "The New England Quarterly," XX, (1947). These citations are from Johnson's notes. Perhaps there is a basis for some genuine controversy, I accept Johnson's versions, in the absence of any subsequent evidence to the contrary.
roger schmeeckle from United States