1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37  39
Comment 20 of 390, added on September 16th, 2004 at 5:58 PM.
I won't start by saying that I'm some kind of expert on this type of thing.
I'm not even close. To tell you the truth I hate when people analyse
someone else's writings. I once had a teacher tell me what I was really
trying to say in a paper. I think that really, only the author knows what
they are talking about, or if there is even any deeper meaning. But, as
you may have already guessed, our class was assigned the job for this poem,
so, what the hey, I guess I can b.s. with the best of them.
I think that this poem is about depression. I don't believe that she
really went to the beach, nor did she bring her dog. Typically the beach
is a happy place. Most people start out happy in their lives, though we
tend to not stay that way forever. The dog, to me, is also a mark of
hapiness, and I think that it's significant that she only mentions it at
the beginning. The mermaids are people that look in on the authors life,
that see her beginning to drowned and do nothing about it. I think that
the major point for my view is made in the paragraph,
"But no Man moved Me -- till the Tide
Went past my simple Shoe --
And past my Apron -- and my Belt --
And past my Bodice -- too --
And made as He would eat me up --
As wholly as a Dew
Upon a Dandelion's Sleeve."
She falls deeper and deeper, felling like she is being swallowed up, with
nothing that she can do. I don't even really see an end to this
depression, just an end to life. The author was obviously troubled, and
had many problems, whether real, or imagined.
Take all of this with a handful of salt though, because, like I said, I
feel like analysis is b.s.
Comment 19 of 390, added on September 16th, 2004 at 5:51 PM.
I felt this poem had many deep meanings about life, and the way things go
at times. I think that there are many times and oppurtunities that makes a
person feel alive and gives them a reason to rise early to make the most of
every moment. Then there are times that make people feel like the end has
come or that the tide has set, and at these time it causes one to reflect
on there journey that is coming to a close, this could be a sad time to see
somthing come to end, but it also can be the start of a new adventure. So
what ever it is that causes you to start early, pursue it with full
purpose, because you never know when that tide will set.
Comment 18 of 390, added on September 16th, 2004 at 5:39 PM.
Everything from apples to arrows to cats, even trains going through
tunnels, is representative of not only intercourse, but male domination.
Perchance even the frigates in this poem symbolize the power and
persuassiveness of men - riding high on the waters of sexual desires. They
steer their chosen courses, and roughly with hemped hands engage presumably
innocent mice(women). Interestingly, the narrator is not sexually aroused
until she overwhelmed, drowned, in a flurry of eroticism. Her ego is no
longer in control, as the floods of water break through her clothes and
symbolic chastity. The narrator's superego had allowed her to walked a
balanced line between land and ocean - morality and animalistic pleasure -
but no more. She has succomed to the domination of men, and the control
that they exert with their "frigates."
and you thought the world was all about mermaids and beach vacations...
Comment 17 of 390, added on September 16th, 2004 at 4:20 PM.
I think one could find several ways to look at the meaning behind this
poem. When applying the idea of dream symbolism you could take Dickinson's
poem as a dream written down and search for the latent content of that
dream. It seems to me that the poem is describing the power of sex. It's
saying a woman can be controlled easily by a man and then left behind just
as quickly. As mentioned by others I think it's obvious that the water is
male sexuality. The mermaids, who are a female symbol, are described to be
in the basement where they belong but get to come up for a minute to glance
at the other woman. The woman walking on the beach is then approached by
the male. He surrounds her and proceeds to journey up her body receiving
the statisfaction he needs and then just as quickly he abandons her after
reaching town because she is no longer desired.
Comment 16 of 390, added on September 16th, 2004 at 3:51 PM.
In I stated Early-- I walked my Dog there are many ways to interpret this
with a psychoanalytical perspective. In the begining of this piece she
started her journey to the sea. The sea has the symbolic meaning and
connotation of femininity. It seems as though the protaginist of this piece
ispiece is entering into the female domain where the "mermaids...came out
to look at me." The narrator is secluded from this different world. She had
to arrive there and when she does the mermaids stare. This displays
feelings of isolation and seclusion. Then she goes to the frigates, or in
other word to a big boat. This sea metaphor takes on a new level. It
becomes the man domain of adventure and excitement, but unlike the mermaids
the people on the boat invite the narrtor to their realm with extended
"hempen hand," and yet there is no true acceptance because they think her a
"mouse." They see her from the sand. They see her and want her to come
'join their fun.' These boatmen want to use her and entice her to come
aboard. The narrator would have with held and stood her ground because "no
man moved me." This demonstrates the philosiphy of female suppres of
sexuality. The superego of the narrator has full control, but a quick
alteration happens when "the tide
went past my simple shoe." THe gratification of the id takes place here.
The water slowly emerges to engulf her whole body. THe narrator goes on to
diplay the repression of her sexuality as the water penetrates "past my
apron and my belt and past my bodice too." This graphically portrays a
passion that overcomes her whole body. THe narrator comes back to her when
she "started too." She flees from this escape from the protocols of
society, but her superego comes back to her and she must get back to town.
The id follows close behind "I felt his silver heel
Upon my ankle then my shoes." THe id doesn't want to be supressed from the
pleasure it so desires. It not until the protagonist gets back to town that
the "sea withdrew." Back in the would of indoctorinated rules and ethics to
be lived by. The narrator goes back to norms of life.
Comment 15 of 390, added on September 16th, 2004 at 2:44 PM.
I see this work as many other Emily Dickinson poems a bash on the roles of
women compared with men. The speaker leaves early to go for a walk becuase
she is a women and could be looked down upon if she were out for pleasure.
She goes to the sea with the hope to find refuge and relief from the daily
strains of womanhood in the 1800's. Just when she should be feeling
peaceful and in full enjoyment of the moment the wave (with male gender
implied) comes and chases her off the beach and sends her back to where she
should be in the home. Dickinson is expressing the male dominance or rather
the attempt of male dominance over women.
Comment 14 of 390, added on September 16th, 2004 at 2:00 PM.
To me the strongest image in this poem is the sea and the girl's flirtation
with it. At first she looks at it and then she gets in. Frued would say
that the sea is a sexual image. I believe that this is the girl's first
time giving into her id. She seems almost selfconcious that the mermaids
(women who are more sexually advice than she) are look at her. The seamen
are also more sexually adviced because these people live on/in the sea.
She feels like a mouse becuase she is inexperienced compaired to the others
around her. The word pearl could signify the girl's virginity because it
is something valuable. I get the impression that she is young becuase in
the first line it says that she started early.
Comment 13 of 390, added on September 16th, 2004 at 1:43 PM.
The first thing that jumped out at me when I read this poem was that Frued
would love this. The strongest image in this poem is the sea and the
girl's flirtation with it. She looks at it for a while and then gets in.
This is a classic image of sexuality. The girl feels like a mouse so maybe
she feels inexperienced or that this is her first time she has really given
into these feelings and let her id take over. Ms. Dickinson uses the word
pearl and to me that could represent her virginity something valuable that
she has given up or given to him. So perhaps this poem is about a girl who
loses her virginity. I feel like this is her first time because it seems
like the speaker is very new to the sea experience in the way that she
describes it. She focuses on details of the mermaids (perhaps women who
are more sexually experienced than she) and she seems almost self conscious
that they are looking at her, and the seamen (also very expereinced becuase
these people reside in/on the sea).
Comment 12 of 390, added on September 16th, 2004 at 12:09 PM.
To me this poem is about the internal struggle of the id and superego. In
the begining of the poem the woman "started early--took my dog-- And
visited the sea" This gives the sense of innocence but at the same time she
goes to the sea as if she knows the social values that restrict her and
that she is fighting them by going to her desires. The mermaids in the
basement, her mystical hidden passions, come out to tempt her. In fact
everything at the sea is trying to get her to give into her id. The
Frigates "extened hemper hands Presuming me to be a mouse Aground--upon the
sand" This makes me think that her desires are calling her and making her
feel "weak." Her superego holds her back to the sexuallity that society
frowns on when she says "But no man moved me" Then she feels the emotions
and desires throughout her body with the tide and begins to give in to the
physical sensations of the moment. Even when she is in the moment is seems
as if there is still a feeling of resistance: "And made as he would eat me
up." This is as if she is worried of being devoured until she says, "And
then--I started too." The internal confict continues at the end of the poem
where the superego comes back when they meet the "Solid Towm" where "No one
He seems to know." This is her knowledge of what society says that she
should do and the id is in conflict with that so doesn't belong there and
Comment 11 of 390, added on September 15th, 2004 at 11:17 PM.
Let’s analyze. I don’t want to poke fun at the process of critical
analysis (good Lord, never!), but I am aching—ACHING—to play the game.
Allow me to hyperbolize, exaggerate, grab context by the throat and bend it
to my whim. I’m going to take this work of literature and, while the
author is rolling in her grave like a rotisserie chicken, bend it to fit
the flavor of the month. Next step: browbeat scholars of great renown to
follow my convolutions until I have “academic respectability.” Literary
theory is a contortionist’s pastime, and I’m double jointed. Let’s get a
Feminism: The poem is not from the point of view of a woman, but rather
spoken from the perspective of a very vain, very narcissistic male. “Took
my Dog” is clearly a reference to his woman, or, as it’s used in popular
music these days, his “bitch” (crazy kids with their crazy hippity
hoppity). His vanity knows no bounds: imaginary creatures—imaginary female
creatures, no less—swim up to him to vie for his attention. A frigate, an
object reeking of testosterone (did you think that conquerors raped and
pillaged foreign women and foreign lands after dismounting pogo sticks? No,
man! They spread their imperial seed from boats—big ones!) is his
contemporary, extending its hempen hands, whatever the hell that means.
Brotherhood! Aha! Frigates equal brotherhood, for some unknown
allegorical reason. This man, excuse me—Man—consorts with frigates, not
breadboxes, not piano benches, but a large man o’ war with cannons poking
through windows like a row of broken teeth. This hyper-masculine man is
adorned with an apron and a bodice, which clearly represents…um, well,
Marxist! Like any theorist backed into a corner by his poor research and
the overcompensating volume of his arguments, I’m jumping ship, frigate if
you will, and chasing another perspective up the proverbial tree.
Remember, English majors, there are no wrong answers. No stupid questions.
Welcome to subjectivity! Up, up to the next theory!
Marxism: “He”—only a tyrannical God would insist on everyone capitalizing
His pronouns. Only a God, a God created by paranoid capitalists, only a
God that slings salvation like dope dealers slipping a dime bag into your
Do you see it? Perspective via theory can make Emily love God, hate Jesus,
grow a penis, and sleep with her father without the drudgery of pesky
incestuous guilt. What can you make Emily do? Grab her arm, twist it,
scream out, "Semiotics! Dance! Signify! Saussure isn't nearly as
compassionate as I am! Wait until Luce Irigaray gets wind of you, Ms.
This poem has been commented on more than 10 times. Click below to see the other comments.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37  39