1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9  11
Comment 12 of 102, added on March 20th, 2012 at 7:27 PM.
This is one awesome article post.Really thank you! Really Cool.
wholesale men clothing
Comment 11 of 102, added on March 7th, 2012 at 5:13 PM.
cWLGDc Thank you ever so for you blog post.Thanks Again. Fantastic.
Adobe OEM Software
Comment 10 of 102, added on February 11th, 2012 at 10:51 AM.
a3wLo2 This article is for professionals..!!
cheap oem software
Comment 9 of 102, added on April 14th, 2009 at 3:27 AM.
Hasn't anyone made the connection to her personal life? As in, the years
her 'Terror' began? She suffered from 'seasonal issues' where she was happy
with certain seasons and sad with others. Scholars think it may be SAD or
bipolar disorder. Look them up. in her poem, she says, "... Twas just this
time, last year, I died."
Dickinson ALWAYS refers to her death poems as the death being in the past,
while telling you of them in the present.
Samantha from United States
Comment 8 of 102, added on December 19th, 2007 at 1:15 PM.
For my highschool class, i had to read this poem, it was not recomended but
i choose it. I think she shows transcendentalism and that we must not miss
what we have left behind, even if that means not missing our true faith
that we are some how bounded to.
Alyssa Plish from United States
Comment 7 of 102, added on April 3rd, 2007 at 1:51 AM.
Richard Brevans below writes, "You notice the word "tassels" to describe
the yellow corn, thats strange" There's nothing strange about it. That's
exactly what corn tassels are called and de-tasseling the corn is something
rural children used to do to prevent cross polination -- something I'm sure
Dickinson knew all about.
Comment 6 of 102, added on April 2nd, 2007 at 10:26 PM.
I got a different view while reading it. I kept thinking how everyone wants
people to miss them after they are gone... it shows that they were loved
and important. But then I think Emily realized that if people missed her
all the time things would be miserable- her stocking wouldn't be filled,
her plate at the table would be empty... so instead she focused on that
they would all be reunited one day anyways and there is no need for them to
miss her as much as she may deserve.
jess from Canada
Comment 5 of 102, added on April 28th, 2006 at 4:29 PM.
This poem is really a nasty attack by Dickinson on the Puritan-type
education and upbringing she had. But its all in a kind of code. You
notice the word "tassels" to describe the yellow corn, thats strange, and
combined with the color red in the next verse, and you realize that she's
making fun of her Puritan college, Mount Holyoke, whose school colors are
red and yellow. So the students are just like rows and rows of corn
wearing their graduation caps with tassels, that's what she thinks of them,
that they are like dumb vegetables. Then the other thing in the poem is
the line about her father multiplying the plates, which is a reference to a
Thanksgiving ceremoney of the Puritans, where they would start handing
around a plate with food on it once the whole town got together, and then
people would take out plates with food they had brought, secretly, and so
after a while there would be lots and lots plates in the room. It was
supposed to be like an episode in the Bible, where one basket of bread fed
everybody in a miracle. This ceremoney was called "multiplying the
plates," and so when the father does this it seems good at first, but then
you realize that he is missing the speaker "least". The speaker is hurt
that her father, of all people, misses her least, and that he cares more
about virtual strangers at these public meetings, where he's passing out
plates of food, than he does about her. So all in all the Puritans come
across as stupid conformity lovers, like rows of standing corn, or really
heartless people who say they love Jesus but don't even care about their
own family members.
Richard Bevans from United States
Comment 4 of 102, added on December 5th, 2005 at 8:52 AM.
On first reading I thought that the poem was actually Dickinson taking on
this persona of a child that has died, as the objects that this child
remembers are things that children notice e.g. tasesls and christmas
stockings etc. But perhaps the most sinister thing about this poem is how
at the end, the child says they will come to her. Her family after they
die, not to heaven or God. Ort to see her again and be one one big happy
family, but to her. It sounds like a self-centered and selfish child and
even worse a evil presence. As by saying to her, it sounds as if shes about
to eat them or something. But thats just my opnion.
from United Kingdom
Comment 3 of 102, added on January 30th, 2005 at 9:10 AM.
I thought one of the most significant points of the poem was that on
carefully reading it appears she is talking about the corn,apple,
pumpkin,stockings i.e.representations of the seasons, and thanksgiving and
christmas and such in terms of missing her and not people emphasised by the
'which'(not who) would miss her 'least' (and not most). Furthermore along
this thought trail, she scorns the celebrations; particularly christmas. In
conclusion I thought it possible that she refers to the end of belief
(either from universal death or secularisation) which would ultimately
result in the demise of such celebrations i.e. 'themselves should come to
from United Kingdom
This poem has been commented on more than 10 times. Click below to see the other comments.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9  11