|
Poet: e.e. cummings
Poem: in time of daffodils
Comment 16 of 16, added on March 14th, 2012 at 9:42 PM.
wfHfbGYrGVEe
No amount of vnoielce can be justified on any account,not only religion.Who can we blame for this bloodshed?Try and rewind--you will realise that all this vnoielce because of religion is a creation of the political so as to remain in power. Those who are being killed are not even aware as to why are they the victims.Sorry state of affairs.
Kuchormyz from Kuwait
Comment 15 of 16, added on March 13th, 2012 at 12:46 AM.
tIcHYbBOnGxSthszZP
I am not concerned about nesadneks since I believe and observe that “Custom” is a deterrent to that behavior. Really, animals are naked and you are suggesting that someone might want to walk around naked; like an animal. Someone, likewise, might want to defecate, like an animal, in public. It is not useful for Law to deal with such things. You are saying it is not useful for Law to deal with such things, so are you claiming that were I desire to defecate and walk around naked like an animal(as it would be my personal wish, feeling no regard for your custom nor your concept of correct behaviour), then the law should not interfere in it? Or would you assign a Moral Police to stop me from doing that? Now, if you are suggesting that there are very many in Iran that desire to walk naked and it is only the existence of Moral Police that is preventing them from doing so, then I suggest that the Iranian society is suffering from a very deep pyscho-pathology in which so many wish to act like animals. No, I am not suggesting that at all. I am asking where exactly is the line you draw? Obviously, you seem to be against nesadneks and it seems not at all a grey area to you. From what I can gather from your comments, you seem not to defend nesadneks at all. I ask you why? if we stop all Moral Police, then NO LAW SHOULD PREVENT AN INDIVIDUAL TO WALK AROUND NAKED. I am not talking about majority of the population, nor a significient minority, I am talking about an individual, and for the sake of this discussion, I would use myself as a guinea pig. In this thought experiment, I am promoting you to the Powerful Ruler of Iran, with a final say in all matters. You have removed the hijab law and all have rejoiced. But in this utopia world, comes M. Ali, desiring to walk around naked. What would your actions be? Would your Moral Police grab me by my balls and take me to prison or allow me walk around fully nude in Vanak Square, confident in the fact that no Law has the right to impose its rule on correct behavior.What would you do, Der Fuhrer? I will only accept your point in this discussion and will concede, if you, as the Dear Leader of this new Iranzamin utopio, allow me to go about my ways. But if you think I, naked man in Vanak, should be legally dealt with, then I submit you are going against your own arguments, and imposing Moral Police to uphold Custom by the will of the Majority.
Ciska from Panama
Comment 14 of 16, added on January 4th, 2012 at 10:54 PM.
WzBHRFIWlBsahFhZnC
Always refreshing to hear a rational anwser.
Lucky from Croatia
Are you looking for more information on this poem? Perhaps you are trying to analyze it? The poem, in time of daffodils, has received 16 comments. Click here to read them, and perhaps post a comment of your own.
|
No amount of vnoielce can be justified on any account,not only religion.Who can we blame for this bloodshed?Try and rewind--you will realise that all this vnoielce because of religion is a creation of the political so as to remain in power. Those who are being killed are not even aware as to why are they the victims.Sorry state of affairs.
Kuchormyz from Kuwait