|
by: Donald A. Dripps
Amazon.com's Price: $5.95 Prices subject to change.
Binding: Digital
Format: HTML
Label: Association of Trial Lawyers of America
Manufacturer: Association of Trial Lawyers of America
Number Of Pages: 7
Publication Date: July 01, 1995
Publisher: Association of Trial Lawyers of America
Release Date: July 28, 2005
Studio: Association of Trial Lawyers of America
Editorial Review:
Product Description:
This digital document is an article from Trial, published by Association of Trial Lawyers of America on July 1, 1995. The length of the article is 1941 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Digital Locker immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.
From the supplier: The US Supreme Court's ruling regarding peremptory challenges in Elem v Purkett means that the right of peremptory challenge remains in tension with the Constitution's ban on arbitrary discrimination. The majority ruling lets litigators strike potential jurors for facially neutral but weak reasons, perhaps inviting racial abuse. So far any approach that bars such abuse of the peremptory challenge on the basis of equal protection also infringes unacceptably on the right to strike jurors except for cause.
Citation Details
Title: 'I didn't like the way he looked.' (standard for racially neutral peremptory challenge)
Author: Donald A. Dripps
Publication: Trial (Magazine/Journal)
Date: July 1, 1995
Publisher: Association of Trial Lawyers of America
Volume: 31 Issue: n7 Page: 94(2)
Distributed by Thomson Gale
|
